Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 26th May 2007 20:18 UTC, submitted by GhePeU
Permalink for comment 243778
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-12-24
Some of your assertions don't make much sense to me. You say that KDE got its infrastructure act together more than 7 years and "KDE 4.0 is going to bring the infrastructure to a whole new level." Well, from what I understand, KDE 4.0 is a major infrastructural reworking. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) So, what I don't understand is that if KDE's infrastructure was so perfect in the KDE 2.0 - 3.5 timeframe, why is the major reworking necessary now, beyond simply porting to Qt 4.x?
Don't get me wrong: I hope KDE 4.0 is a major success, and I wish KDE all the best. I simply find the fanboyism from some misguided KDE fans a bit tiresome. It is ok to love your chosen desktop without denigrating other desktops, no?