Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2007 21:07 UTC
Windows "There are a myriad of both subtle and fundamental differences in the basic architecture of Windows Server 2008, which could dramatically change not only the way it's used in the enterprise, but also the logical and physical structure of networks where it's the dominant OS. The abilities to consolidate servers, to manage hardware more effectively, to remotely manage hardware without the graphical traffic, and to radically alter the system security model, could present a more compelling argument for customers to plan their WS2K8 migrations now, than the arguments for moving from Windows 2000 to Server 2003."
Permalink for comment 243791
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Somehow...
by google_ninja on Tue 29th May 2007 04:34 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Somehow..."
google_ninja
Member since:
2006-02-05

err, how is microsnot doing a good job because there exists third party stuff?


MS bends over backwards to give the best tools, APIs, and environment for commercial application development.

besides, linux supports more hardware devices than vista does, third party drivers included...


Linux may support more legacy hardware, but I call BS on third party drivers. Supporting closed source driver development on linux is pure hell, it requires a re-release for every minor release of the kernel (even bug fixes can break the ABI).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5