Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th May 2007 09:51 UTC, submitted by martini
Permalink for comment 244727
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-08-18
I understand about the IBM license fees but that makes no difference to the paying user. IBM surely doesn't want to see OS/2 exceed.
Open Office is a significant program but not the only one. There is several Office solutions (both FOSS and Commercial) for *nix, MacOS, and Windows.
Solaris can be downloaded free and Open Solaris is free and open source. It also supports more software. So yes, Solaris is in a better position even on a client workstation. However, Solaris is better suited for servers as the desktop initiatives are new with Open Solaris.
I find it hard to believe there can be an eComStation enthusiast group with it costing so much, being proprietary and superseded all-in-one.
I think the few businesses who still use OS/2 continue to do so because migration costs to other platforms would be more than just paying for a copy of eComStation.