Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Jun 2007 16:38 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 245299
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-19
well it is a bit confusing on the freespire forums since everything I post gets turned into a negative bashing of spire....and I have to fend off ten people nit-picking everything I say....and might I suggest that if you do not care to discuss something then just ignore it - otherwise you are wasting everyones time. God knows that nobody on a forum or a internet news site has time to waste....
I appreciate the assumption that I haven't read the paper.....real nice. Nice way to keep it on a sane level and not cause someone to be upset and argumentative.
I appreciate that you read into my words that I think you are lying....nice way to discuss something.
Yes, you ran apt, but I didn't. Show ME not tell me about it.
The things I read seemed to suggest it was linspire and there warehouse - is that a good measure of apt performance considering they mix old/new packages which apt was likely never meant to handle?
Maybe answer a few of my questions specifically and I may not repeat them - or just keep repeating how you can guide the solver...yad yada...