Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Jun 2007 14:37 UTC
Geeks.com was so kind as to send me the TS-21F5-R, a 21-Inch TFT Flat Panel LCD Color Widescreen Monitor (it is a de-branded HP LCD monitor) for review. At USD 245.99, that is a whole lot of screen real estate. Read on for my findings.
Permalink for comment 245470
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's clear you have no idea whatsoever about reviewing products.
Let me ask you a question. Would you review the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano in the same way you would review the Ford Focus?
Of course you don't. Both products are targeted at different people, and hence they require a different assessment. 21" at 250USD means this is a low-end monitor targeted at ordinary consumers (not at professional users), and they have their own set of buying decisions; you think they give a rat's behind about all the technical details? Of course they don't. They want to know: is this monitor good value for money?
Please, don't tell me how to structure my reviews. Some reviews, like this one, simply don't require a deep, technical assessment. Contrary to i.e. when I reviewed QNX a few years ago, which turned out to be a different review completely.
Member since:
2005-06-29
It's clear you have no idea whatsoever about reviewing products.
Let me ask you a question. Would you review the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano in the same way you would review the Ford Focus?
Of course you don't. Both products are targeted at different people, and hence they require a different assessment. 21" at 250USD means this is a low-end monitor targeted at ordinary consumers (not at professional users), and they have their own set of buying decisions; you think they give a rat's behind about all the technical details? Of course they don't. They want to know: is this monitor good value for money?
Please, don't tell me how to structure my reviews. Some reviews, like this one, simply don't require a deep, technical assessment. Contrary to i.e. when I reviewed QNX a few years ago, which turned out to be a different review completely.