Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Jun 2007 14:37 UTC, submitted by Alexandros Roussos
Permalink for comment 245699
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-01-30
What's not objective about the features per cubic inch part?
What's not objective about the TCO part?
How can I factor in the OS X experience, as you suggest, and at the same time remain objective?
(these are rhetorical questions, you don't need to answer them)
By the way, I really don't like your condecending tone, again. I'm not stupid.
Anyhow, as far as I can see, you are the one who fails to prove that Apple charges a hardware tax. You just take it as a fact. As far as I know, you are supposed to prove your stance, I only need to raise considerable doubt
Edited 2007-06-06 16:53