Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Jun 2007 15:01 UTC, submitted by AdministratorX
Permalink for comment 246392
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-08
I am by no means a MS supporter but I have to start to wonder weather theses patent agreements contain confidential agreements. I cannot for the life of me understand how smart and successful companies are signing these agreements without being presented any info.
It could very well be that MS has something, not to say that we as the Linux community could not remove, however I think that is the reason for not announcing. I believe that there may be something infringing. MS may not want to release because they know that we would just re-write the code and remove it . Instead they would rather approach companies individually on some patent extortion tactics.
This just my guess approach the company get them to sign a license agreement strenghten the belief that the code has infringed and caused you damage, use the people who have signed the agreements as evidence of their belief in the violation.