Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Jun 2007 20:02 UTC, submitted by Michael
AMD "Last week we had published The Truth About ATI/AMD & Linux, and to no real surprise, the feedback ranged from beliefs that it was propaganda to others being grateful that AMD finally shared some additional information with their Linux customers about the fglrx development cycle. While the article was far from being propaganda, what had outraged a number of open-source developers were AMD's comments on the R200 support or there the lack of. In this article, we have a few additional comments to share along with what some open-source developers had to say about AMD's information."
Permalink for comment 246554
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: no surprises
by lazywally on Sat 9th Jun 2007 13:56 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: no surprises"
lazywally
Member since:
2005-07-06


* We don't want source code, we want specifications on how to interface to the device.


:-) We, on the other hand, want the companies to release drivers, even binary, of the same quality, with the same level of attention for our free platforms as they do with windows so our hardware work as well on Linux or BSD as they do on windows.

Reply Parent Score: 3