When Steve Jobs mentioned a few weeks ago that there will be "some sort of app development" for the iPhone, everyone assumed he meant widgets. Widgets are less powerful than native applications, and depending on the underlying OS hooks offered, they can be even less powerful than J2ME apps. But when Jobs came out today to outright sell us Web 2.0 and said that "no SDK required", I felt cheated.
Permalink for comment 247086
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Maybe. But users want applications. You highly disregard this.
I suggest you go read my archives of my blog. There, you will find information about my brother, an honest working electrician, who shun away the Linux touchscreen "wow-your-friends" cellphone I sent him last year because it wouldn't run any third party native apps (Motorola wouldn't release their SDK). Additionally, my brother can not afford to pay for GPRS and doesn't have WiFi at home (DSL is very expensive in Greece). In that respect, the iPhone is a worse phone for him than the Motorola Linux one was, as the iPhone can't even run J2ME, let alone native apps or Widgets.
Member since:
2005-06-28
Maybe. But users want applications. You highly disregard this.
I suggest you go read my archives of my blog. There, you will find information about my brother, an honest working electrician, who shun away the Linux touchscreen "wow-your-friends" cellphone I sent him last year because it wouldn't run any third party native apps (Motorola wouldn't release their SDK). Additionally, my brother can not afford to pay for GPRS and doesn't have WiFi at home (DSL is very expensive in Greece). In that respect, the iPhone is a worse phone for him than the Motorola Linux one was, as the iPhone can't even run J2ME, let alone native apps or Widgets.
Don't underestimate what people need these days.