Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jun 2007 10:38 UTC, submitted by Nixomayor
Permalink for comment 247517
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-08
There is one problem with this though. It's unlikely that Linux can move to GPL 3 even if Linus wants it too. Because remember, that Linus put a clause in the GPL 2 that Linux uses that excluses the "or at your option, any future version of this license". In otherwords, unlike the normal GPL 2, Linux code, cannot automatically update to GPL 3. Updating Linux to GPL 3 will require the explicit permission of anyone who has ever contributed code to the Linux kernel. Overall, it would be logistical nightmare trying to move Linux to GPL 3.