Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 15th Jun 2007 12:11 UTC, submitted by Jesse R. (mouser)
A very early initial draft of this review was posted on OSNews many months ago. The final version just went live and is about three times as long, now including open source alternatives, as well as a review of the new online word processor solutions.
Permalink for comment 248115
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-03-12
To be fair 14 Word processors have been covered, I'm not even through reading it btw, and includes most I have heard of, and I've never heard of pages.
The picture of MS-OOXML specification is worth a look if nothing else.
the strangest thing is "Second rule: be happy with your choice, because statistics show you're not likely to change."
I think a lot of old Wordperfect users would disagree with this one.