Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Jun 2007 21:54 UTC, submitted by ericvh
Permalink for comment 248844
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-04-21
X-Window? GUI? What flexibility?
You know, the flexibility that allows you to choose WindowMaker or blackbox, GNOME or KDE?
We are talking about an operating system not about a geek-chick magnet! Plan 9 comes with a GUI that has all and more capabilities than X-Window, like network transparency (even if it has no networking code on it) and alpha blending (Porter-Duff algebra... The "Duff" guy worked at bell labs at the time rio, the Plan 9 GUI came to life). I am not saying that it is beautiful, though... But I like it and it gets my work done.
It may have "more capabilities than X Window", but it sorely lacks the one I wrote about in my first post. Yes, there will always be people who really don't give a damn about the state of their windowing system as long as it works, but I suspect those among us who can't work with a system which looks like a camel's rear end are in the majority. And of course although we may all agree that X (the variable, not the window system) looks like a camel's arse, we're very unlikely to all agree on whether A, B, C, Y, or Z doesn't.