Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Jun 2007 18:38 UTC, submitted by AdamW
Permalink for comment 249138
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-12-02
"I don't see it being wrong for a Linux developer to pay Microsoft to legally use their codecs, etc in Linux software. Though I find it appauling for Microsoft to openly imply this is for code protection claiming with out proving Linux distributions use Microsoft code. Why doesn't the USA DOJ (Department of Justice) step in to stop Microsoft until they can actually provide evidence of their code being used in the Linux kernel and Linux software."
Microsoft has not said anywhere that Linux is using Microsoft code. What they have implied is that Linux may violate patents that Microsoft holds. Patents and code are not the same thing.