Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Jun 2007 20:07 UTC, submitted by Valour
Permalink for comment 249407
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-25
That's like saying condoms are unnecessary if you know how to pull - never mind, I wont elaborate. You know what I'm getting at.
Point is no matter how good the administrator is, it's the OS that has to deal with a security threat. At some point you have to let in _something_ in order for the server to be of any use at all, and if the code for that particular something has a flaw in it... THAT is what matters in the end.
In other words the OS is VASTLY more important than the administrator. A really good administrator with a shitty OS wont do a damned bit of good...
Edited 2007-06-20 22:01