Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 22nd Jun 2007 06:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 249986
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
For the most part i agree that people here are pretty hard on MS in compairison to other platforms, but there is one substancial difference between Windows and Linux (but not between Windows and Mac), Linux is developed, for the most part, for free. As in; developers spending their time working on an operating system that they want, instead of spending time with their families or gaming or making money to pay the morgage. So, since Windows is entirely developed as a commerical product by a comercial company that you pay to use it's software, i do beleive that there is a good reason to be a bit harsher when Microsoft takes five years to update it's OS and people are wondering if that update is really worth the 500 pricetag.