Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 22nd Jun 2007 06:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 250214
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-04
"They aren't high. Most people have had computers than can run it for many many years."
What are people getting for the increased system requirements? Vista offers nothing(except DRM) over XP SP2. MS should have just offered another service pack for XP instead of wasting billions on that Vista monstrosity.
"EULA has been through several revisions since then. And you are just being paranoid."
The EULA is vile, and MS can make it even more vile any time they choose. MS is being given too much control of people's computers, and people should be informed of such monopolistic abuse.
"Many, sure. Good? Hardly."
Linux market share is increasing everyday, and the number of program choices are increasing with it.
"I have Vista. I can use drivers that aren't signed. Just click to use unsigned drivers anyways. Works everytime. Though the vast majority of drivers are signed so it's not an issue."
MS could prevent the use of "unsigned" drivers at any time, they would probably claim it is for "security" reasons. It would just be another attempt to gain even more control of people's computers. MS should never be trusted.
"Very few release linux drivers. You can't even argue that Linux has better hardware support."
There have been many complaints about hardware(and software) not working with Vista. Linux has good hardware support and it is getting better everyday.
"Conspire against their customers? Their customers want to be able to play that content. How would they feel if they couldn't play it? It's there for those who want it and it doesn't affect those who don't. Best of both worlds."
DRM should not be forcibly integrated into the OS, people should be given a choice.
"In linux you can't play your HD-DVD or Blue Ray discs at all. How much fun is that? Not even in OSX."
That is why most people will be using regular DVD's and movie downloads on their computers.
"And the DRM on the discs doesn't interfere with anything I do at all."
The DRM is useless and does nothing to stop piracy, it just annoys paying customers.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070115-8616.html
"It's clear you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about and you have no interest in getting clue. You'd just rather spread your FUD. Have fun with that. It's been debunked over and over again."
Informing people about a distasteful and objectionable monopolist and the nasty software it's "customers" are forced to buy is not spreading FUD. Many people will be switching to Linux because of MS's morally debased treatment of it's "customers".