Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Jun 2007 20:40 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Privacy, Security, Encryption "I was somewhat surprised (but pleased) at the level of interest back when I published my Windows Vista - 90 Day Vulnerability Report. It was about the earliest span of time I thought might give us some indicators, and the indicators did look good. Six months is a much more interesting time frame, and gives us the opportunity to see if the early trend indicators are holding up, or if the early signs of progress were a short-term gain."
Permalink for comment 250532
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Meaningless "Report"
by Supreme Dragon on Tue 26th Jun 2007 01:03 UTC in reply to "RE: Meaningless "Report""
Supreme Dragon
Member since:

Linux code is available for all to see, and Linux has an impressive record of stability, reliability, security and performance. MS won't show the code and the reason just might be embarrassment. Windows has a horrible record of shoddy quality, and the DRM and frightening EULA makes Windows an even more wretched choice. To even suggest that Windows code could possibly match Linux is hilariously nonsensical.

Reply Parent Score: -3