Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jun 2007 21:39 UTC, submitted by jayson.knight
Permalink for comment 251454
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-20
You cannot run legally both XP and Vista on same machine unless You have retail licenses, as far as I know. That would mean in order to run them You would have to shell out ~500-800$ just for OS which isn't near of being smart. Problem with Vista is that XP is just fine, and upgrade price(hardware and software) does not hold any justifiable benefit, yet.
OEM have all the rights to demand this sort of MS move, since Vista ready or even Vista premium machines are often too unstable or poorely supported in VIsta. People are still using years old periferial hardware for which Vista isn't driver ready.