Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 1st Jul 2007 10:30 UTC
Permalink for comment 252292
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-05
You completely miss the point. This isn't tech news at all, and arguably it isn't news. At best it is a legal detail with the word "possibly" attached. It has nothing to do with the amount of lawyerdom involved in open source software as distinct from proprietary software, either.
I'm sorry if your first thought on waking is "I must check up on the legal disputes today because that's what all good, right-on tech folks do" but that is what you're saying. And if you think this has anything worthwhile to do with technology then it is you, not I, who's been reading too many tech articles on the internet lately.
No interest here in taking America's completely absurd legal and patent system at face value, and with it the sheer self-importance of thinking that if lawyers are involved, wow, this must be significant news. Look around at the great inventions of the last 20 years and ask how many of them were made by a lawyer.