Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 7th Jul 2007 19:19 UTC, submitted by flanque
Mobile-gadget makers are starting to take advantage of software-defined radio, a new technology allowing a single device to receive signals from multiple sources, including TV stations and cell phone networks. But a new federal rule set to take effect Friday could mean that radios built on 'open-source elements' may encounter a more sluggish path to market - or, in the worst case scenario, be shut out altogether. U.S. regulators, it seems, believe the inherently public nature of open-source code makes it more vulnerable to hackers, leaving 'a high burden to demonstrate that it is sufficiently secure'.
Permalink for comment 253879
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2007-04-06
You do raise an excellent point. SDRs are different from PCs and other embedded systems. It would make no sense to discourage open source in mobile phones for instance, but it is different for SDRs where the frequeny range of the tranceivers is under the control of the software (or firmware), making it easy for potential abuse.
But however, open source in the case of SDRs can help to reduce developement costs thus making the devices cheaper and also help foster good standards (SDR ICs that are easy to program and debug and with good third party tools for doing so, for example),just as in any other embedded system industry. And it is possible to prevent modified versions of the opensource SDR software to run on the device (even though the FSF doesn't like it). AMD's PIC computer* and the TIVO DVR completely prevent modified (or entirely new) versions of the source code to run on them.
This 'locking down' of devices is disallowed under the new GPL3 but perfectly possible under other open source licenses (including the GPL 2, google for Tivoisation for more info). Hence usage of open source only stands to benefit all the parties involved. What should be prevented, is the ability to modify the device range.
Moreover usage of strong digital encryption and a spread spectrum system, as well as other techniques should be carried out to prevent eavsdropping and interference.
* AMD's Personal Internet Communicator (PIC) did not run open source software. Hackers have tried their best to run linux on it, but to no avail (as I last checked). The PIC is discontinued now.