Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jul 2007 18:12 UTC, submitted by deanlinkous
GNU, GPL, Open Source "Now that Microsoft has declared itself untouched by any GPLv3 terms, everyone is trying to figure out if they have a leg to stand on. There is a whole lot of analysis going on, with some wondering if Microsoft is a distributor of software under GPLv3 by means of the voucher distribution and others wondering just what those vouchers included."
Permalink for comment 254337
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: The real issue
by Googlesaurus on Tue 10th Jul 2007 21:20 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: The real issue"
Member since:

"The issue of secondary liability is mentioned in the wording of GPL3."

Not a single word of GPLv3 has anything to do with MS. They ain't touched it with a ten foot pole via any means. This whole unexpiring voucher thing is in a word "nonsense".

Reply Parent Score: 0