Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Jul 2007 20:06 UTC, submitted by AdamW
Permalink for comment 255565
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
For some kind of data it might make sense to also store it in the file or in extended file system attributes. This is currently not implemented AFAIK and as Aaron pointed out, would be subject to policies.
IMHO all such metadata information should be stored per-file, ie. in extended attributes cos then it could be shared by all users. And I don't really like the idea of a single database with all the metadata cos it could get corrupted, or if it got deleted one way or another you'd lose ALL metadata. But to have public and private metadata saved per-file would most likely require modifications to existing filesystems, or a completely new one. Hopefully this will happen, I'm sure a lot of people would find such a thing useful even if I can't imagine myself gaining much from that.