Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Jul 2007 22:02 UTC
"Forget software politics for a minute - what does the new Samba licensing mean for the version you're actually running, and for the distribution that packages it for you? Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison explains."
Permalink for comment 256544
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
if that developer was Chani from KDE, they emailed TT and got the following reply:
“We are currently evaluating the impact that licensing Qt under GPLv3 (it
is currently GPLv2 only) would have for our dual licensing model. In
particular, the in-house development clause that is new in GPLv3 will
have some impact on our business model, or at least require a certain
amount of positioning (and thus preparation).”
So, like most I guess, TT are looking at what the ramifications are before any possible switch over (which is of course the diligent thing to do). Hopefully (well to me anyway, I know there are those who aren't exactly fans of GPL3) they make the switch in the not to distant future
Member since:
2006-04-04
if that developer was Chani from KDE, they emailed TT and got the following reply:
“We are currently evaluating the impact that licensing Qt under GPLv3 (it
is currently GPLv2 only) would have for our dual licensing model. In
particular, the in-house development clause that is new in GPLv3 will
have some impact on our business model, or at least require a certain
amount of positioning (and thus preparation).”
http://chani.wordpress.com/2007/07/18/uhoh/
So, like most I guess, TT are looking at what the ramifications are before any possible switch over (which is of course the diligent thing to do). Hopefully (well to me anyway, I know there are those who aren't exactly fans of GPL3) they make the switch in the not to distant future