Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 21:20 UTC, submitted by Innova
Permalink for comment 257712
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
APT doesn't give you the ability to choose what features you want the installed packages to have. You just gotta stick with what you're given. I'm sure APT is a nice package manager and all, but in my book it just doesn't beat portage. Different needs and tastes for different audiences, you know? No point in arguing about which one is better.
My own thoughts about portage? Well, sure, I'd like it if I could just emerge stuff without having to wait several hours for the computer compiling stuff, but then again, I've tried a few other distros and never felt at home in any of them. Why? Well, I don't always know _exactly_ what's installed and what's going on, and some packages don't have the features I would like them to have. So, it's a trade-off for me. I trade fast installation of packages to a completely custom built system with just the features I want. Nothing more, nothing less.