Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 28th Jul 2007 09:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 258998
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
IMHO this has all gone by and far out of hand. Some things do get in the kernel, some don't. That's just the way it is. If you can't handle that then don't, you're free to stop caring. I can't really say much about CK cos I don't know him as a person and I see lots of very biased arguments both against him and in favor of him, but yeah, Linus treated him quite coldly. But I'd assume he does that to everyone else too.
I'm just wondering the whole scheduler thing..How many of you people actually can explain what it is a scheduler does and on what grounds is CK's work better than Ingo's? I hear that Con's one is better for desktop and Ingo's is better for mixed workloads so in my view it might be a good idea to include both and just select either one depending on whether it's going to be used on a desktop or not. But well, I've been using the old scheduler for god knows how long and my desktop works just fine without either of those schedulers...