Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 28th Jul 2007 09:04 UTC
Linux "People who think SD was 'perfect' were simply ignoring reality," Linus Torvalds began in a succinct explanation as to why he chose the CFS scheduler written by Ingo Molnar instead of the SD scheduler written by Con Kolivas. He continued, "sadly, that seemed to include Con too, which was one of the main reasons that I never [entertained] the notion of merging SD for very long at all: Con ended up arguing against people who reported problems, rather than trying to work with them." He went on to stress the importance of working toward a solution that is good for everyone, "that was where the SD patches fell down. They didn't have a maintainer that I could trust to actually care about any other issues than his own." Update: OSNews user superstoned pointed us to the other side of the story.
Permalink for comment 259065
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Time to move on
by tsedlmeyer on Sat 28th Jul 2007 18:31 UTC in reply to "RE: Time to move on"
Member since:

Anyway, I guess Linus only cares about the opinions of long-time, die-hard kernel programmers. If you're just a user, even a user who makes benchmarks like heckhacker1 above, you are an "armchair complainer" and irrelevant.

Wonder why Linus doesn't think OSNews is objective?

Reply Parent Score: 4