
"Development of OpenHAL, a wireless network component for Linux,
can now resume unfettered after months of legal uncertainty. OpenHAL allows people with wireless cards based on technology from Atheros Communications, Inc. to connect to networks using solely free and open source software. Earlier this year, allegations were made that OpenHAL might include material that infringed the copyright of Atheros' proprietary HAL software. The Linux Wireless developers asked the Software Freedom Law Center to investigate these rumors, and SFLC agreed to help on a pro-bono basis."
Member since:
2005-07-06
These kinds of statements are very inflammatory. Perhaps you are not a native English speaker, in which case it is understandable. Otherwise, to suggest that they were checking out whether or not is was "okay to infringe upon a company's copyrights" is a combination of "begging the questions", "ad hominem" and "straw man" logical fallacies all rolled into one.