Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 4th Aug 2007 20:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 261210
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-01-27
It's interesting that Slackware and Debian, the distributions that are more under the radar so to speak, prove to be more vibrant than the current enterprise leaders.
The fact that they have mostly kept true to their roots makes them better to base a derivative off than any of the enterprise distributions that want to be everything to everyone, emulating the ways of the number one software vendor.
I have been creating a distribution based on Slackware since 2005 with many software packages added or recompiled and it's been a far better experience than I have ever had with Red Hat or SUSE. Now I have ported it to MIPS and am starting a SPARC port and possibly IA-64 and POWER versions in the future.
As you say the Linux distribution market is very young and nothing has been decided yet. I appreciate that Ubuntu is very much focused on the desktop and trying to improve the overall experience for beginners and advanced users alike.
Nowadays when I think of Linux I only thing of these two distributions and their foremost derivatives and the others can take their ball home and bring it back when it is significantly improved.