Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Aug 2007 20:23 UTC, submitted by jello
Permalink for comment 262542
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-22
I have often wondered about this myself, and I posted a message to that effect on here a month ago.
http://www.osnews.com/permalink.php?news_id=18321&comment_id=258135
I still think that it's an incredible shame that things turned out the way they did. Back then, Microsoft seemed totally invincible (with Windows being pretty much the only OS that most users would ever consider using). Also, the possibility of owning a home computer with any kind of SMP was just a pipe dream.
Yet today here we are with significant numbers of computer users becoming increasingly disillusioned with Vista (and Microsoft in general) and wondering what alternative OS they can use instead on their everyday 64bit core2duo's (or even quad core gaming rigs etc).
Be was a fantastic OS (even way back then) so after 10 further years of development (and with the computer landscape being the way it is at the moment) then this really could have been the tipping point for Be.