Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Aug 2007 16:17 UTC, submitted by dylansmrjones
Permalink for comment 263104
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-15
Back in time, they had some good products. Too bad a gang of professional gamblers put their hands on the company and decided that they should try their "luck" and convinced share holders besides all signs. Probably some of them made more money on this "big dogs proxy game" than they could earn on the same period had not them started all this sellout. Yes, don't be ingenuous, things like that don't just "happen", they are pretty much calculated, specially if the risk can be redirect to someone else pocket. I hope the laws will be fixed so that its effects become devastating on bad managers all over the country with similar management patterns.
Wish luck for all good employers still working there.