Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Aug 2007 21:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 263821
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-05-04
Well, considering Novell would have no rights to demand royalties due to their ongoing distribution of Linux under the GPL, thus relinquishing any copyright claims they could have against it, about all they would accomplish is landing themselves in the same mess SCO is in currently.
If Novell's shareholders really demand for that to happen, they're about as stupid as the people who invested in SCO without doing even the most basic level of research re: their claims.
I simply don't see it happening. SCO was a rare case of a company launching a blitzkrieg with a butter knife (and a brittle one that was about to snap at that)....most business people are not that stupid.