Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Aug 2007 21:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 263894
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Of course I could be misreading.
Maybe he was, but what would be the point?
People who use Unix SysV by and large already have a paid-up license for it.
People who run Linux don't need Unix to be under the GPL because Linux is not a copy of Unix.
BSD Unix is already liberally licensed and open source.
Finally, Unix 32V (aka ancient Unix) is already released as public domain code.
http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf