Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Aug 2007 21:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 263963
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
One doesn't have to be a lawyer to state the facts. The facts are that Sun licensed the rights to UNIX well before SCO or Novell ever were involved. Therefore, anyone, lawyer or not, can make a logical conclusion about the result. No legal advice required.
Exactly, which is why statements by Sun employees about the *fact* that they had their rights from AT&T are important.
You seem to not understand that some of these "Not Lawyers" people know the exact terms under which Sun received their code.
Not only that, people who are legal professionals, such as the person at GrokLaw, posted that the judge upheld the deals that SCO made as legal. The only thing that Novell is entitled to is to receive the royalties that Sun and MicroSoft paid to SCO.