Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 16th Aug 2007 23:25 UTC, submitted by Jonas Persson
Permalink for comment 264149
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-31
Msft's arrogance will never cease to amaze me. In msft world, anything that is not glowing praise of windows is classified as anti-windows "FUD."
Think about what FUD stands for. FUD is not about criticizing the competition. FUD is a surreptitious and deicetful attempt to make somebody feel uneasy about the competition, i.e. maybe the competitor's product is somehow illegal.
Now ask yourself: has the linux camp ever spent millions of dollars on mis-information campaigns? How about lying to the US-DoJ, or the EU? How about an letter writing astro-turf campaign where it turned out that many of letters were from dead people? How about fake tco studies? Fake benchmark studies? How about filing hundreds of bogus patents? How about funding an obviously bogus lawsuit that served no purpose other than to cast a legal cloud over the competition? How about hiring shill journalists like Enderle? How about sites like "LinuxWorld" which are actually strongly anti-Linux. How about these secretive deals with linux vendors where msft claims to protect patent violations - but msft won't specify those "violations."
And msft compares honest criticism to msft's elaborate multi-million (billion?) dollar scams? Please, get real.