Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Aug 2007 22:10 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 265192
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
(I hate the fact select-middle-click-to-paste doesn't work on windows, and the fact I have to use that inferior excuse for an OS in my daily job. sorry about that.)
>I wouldn't expect KDE4 to blitz GNOME, people like what
>they are used to and have grown fond of GNOME.
Sure, sure. I don't expect a huge mass-migration to KDE, from Gnome either... Maybe the adoption rate for NEW users might shift back to KDE, though. Either case, FOSS wins.
BTW and I must say, I see more and more work on the basics in Gnome lately. Might be due to all the "three-point-zero" discussions, or due to KDE working on the libs, but whatever causes it - there are some nice infrastructural improvements in the work. /me likes that.
And personally, I don't care that much about artwork. I mean, Ubuntu imho looks better than Kubuntu, and it has been that way since a long time (Ubuntu and Kubuntu both are the best looking distro's out there, imho). So that won't change much. Gnome always had more theme and artists stuff, I never understood why ppl called KDE the eyecandy DE, Gnome looks much better... KDE is more efficient (though maybe slightly harder) to use, THAT's why I use it. Themes can be changed, anyway.