Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Aug 2007 22:21 UTC
Permalink for comment 266219
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-08-11
This scheduling thing completely doesn't make sense. I understand people saying more CPU time for multimedia is great but the fact is that you dont want any more than "enough" CPU time to stop it from skipping.
When do many people listen to music on their PC? Answer: When they're DOING SOMETHING ELSE AT THE SAME TIME.
You dont want you PC to basically freeze up when you play music or video. So you still need something like CFS to handle it properly. Sure, give a little more cpu time to multimedia but dont go crazy about it. A good cpu and good scheduler will be more than enough to ensure skip-free music and video.
Maybe they should look at Vista's memory and disk usage instead??