Linked by Kroc on Thu 30th Aug 2007 13:03 UTC
Editorial I hear often that when something new appears that "competition is good". The primary reasons competition is seen as good, are: it drives down prices; it gives consumers more choice; it pushes technology forward, quicker. Competition is not good because: competition is why consumers have to choose between HD-DVD and BluRay; competition is why DRM exists; and more. In this article, each of the supposed benefits of competition will be looked at in more detail.
Permalink for comment 266962
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
A rather odd opinion the author has
by Laurence on Thu 30th Aug 2007 13:27 UTC
Laurence
Member since:
2007-03-26

"The primary reasons competition is seen as good, are: [snip] it gives consumers more choice; [snip] Competition is not good because: competition is why consumers have to choose between HD-DVD and BluRay; competition is why DRM exists; and more."


What an odd argument to make. One minute the author is saying consumer choice is good, then the next moment he is implying that choice is bad.

More to the point - Sure DRM exists through capitalism paranoia, not through competition. There's plenty of examples of where competition doesn't have to be directly related to commercialisation (FOSS for example). Besides, and to quote the author, consumers have the choice to choose avoid DRM by using systems that don't endorse such shackles.

[edit - missed out quotes]

Edited 2007-08-30 13:30

Reply Score: 10