Linked by Kroc on Thu 30th Aug 2007 13:03 UTC
Permalink for comment 267082
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-11
You are perfectly free to buy an Itanium, a Sparc, or a PPC. Anyone is.
Intel tried to push Itanium. The industry, and the public chose X86_64.
I agree, and what I meant was not necessarily that we should have all moved to SPARC. The competition itself also had the advantage of making both Intel and AMD push the x86 with some good innovations.
However, in those moments when I daydream, I keep thinking what computers would have been like if desktops hadn't been hindered by the slow progress of x86 in the late 90s.
Many thanks for your reply. I should have pointed out those things from the very beginning before criticizing the article's author for not telling the whole story about competition.