Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 31st Aug 2007 19:17 UTC, submitted by ganges master
Permalink for comment 267478
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-11-09
I respect how Python development seems to constantly be pursuing quality over maintaining backwards compatibility. An important part of optimization is being able to throw away efforts that are not suitable for the future, from a quality perspective.
I hope that the market will realize this over time, as well, and embrace the new possibilities the language seems to offer. Even if it will break existing programs.
I will *definitely* be looking into Python 3.0!