Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Sep 2007 21:40 UTC, submitted by archiesteel
Permalink for comment 268640
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-04
As described in increasing detail, the ISO organization has been subjected to much blatant manipulation by Microsoft in order to try and become a self-appointed, monopolistic *standard controller*. How much more of an indication that it may not be the best idea to have this one company with a God-complex controlling (and milking) the world's IT resources do we need in order to just say no to this type of manipulation? What is wrong with taking the cooperative approach and submitting backwards-compatible modifications to the existing ODF ISO standard? Why does Microsoft have to reinvent the wheel so that it can only be turned by them? Turning the ISO approval process into a farce of corruption does little to prove anything but the fact that self-interest and greed seems to be the major motivator of Microsoft's actions.
Under these circumstances, letters and petitions to your government asking for the rejection of any future attempts to institute the OOXML format as an ISO standard may be one way to stop this type of abuse of process in the future.