Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Sep 2007 17:23 UTC, submitted by troy.unrau
KDE Ars takes a look at KDE 4.0 Beta 2, and concludes: "This beta may not be the end result yet, but there has definitely been a lot of progress since the last one. For the first time I have been able to stop writing about individual features within KDE 4 and start to talk about the level of integration, and general feel of the system to get an impression of how KDE 4.0 will feel like to use."
Permalink for comment 268882
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Visual style
by steogede2 on Wed 5th Sep 2007 15:14 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Visual style"
steogede2
Member since:
2007-08-17

>> I thought the KDE 3.5 save dialog was perfect. The KDE4 dialog is thus pretty close as well, though I really hate replacing the address bar with breadcrumbs (that what it's called?). An address bar one can type in enables one to do stuff like "locate: mp3" to use the locate ioslave to display all folders on all drives whose name includes "mp3".

The breadcrumb itself doesn't allow to type say "locate: mp3", however, if it is anything like Windows Vista's and Gnome's/Nautilus' there will be a there will be a button you can click on to change it into an address bar.

>> What does the breadcrumb bar allow? Clicking on a parent directory? That's what the "up" button is for. Removing the ability to type in the directory one wishes to save to, and replacing it with a new clutter of buttons (one for each level of the directory tree) looks naff and brings no great advantage I can see (though others may).

The advantage of a bread crumb is that you can navigate a complex tree quickly without needing to take your hand off the mouse - much like a tree view, but more concise. You can navigate up a number of branches up the tree in one click - additionally the crumbs often have dropdowns so you can choose an any sub-directory of any parent directory in two clicks.

Reply Parent Score: 1