Linked by Joost van der Sluis on Mon 10th Sep 2007 16:03 UTC
Permalink for comment 270081
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-10
Lazarus does not yet have the polish of Delphi, but it can create nice cross-platform applications. The Windows applications are really very good. Linux relies on GTK1, and dependency issues make supportimg all distributions difficult. The OSX Carbon components have really progressed rapidly - you can create usuable OSX, Windows and Linux apps simply by recompiling to the target OS.
I actually think that the Carbon/Cocoa distinction is a bit silly - Lazarus allows a user to create good applications fast, and I really think Carbon is so useful it will be supported for a long time, e.g. see
http://unsanity.org/archives/mac_os_x/carbon_vs_cocoa.php