Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Sep 2007 21:01 UTC
Permalink for comment 270173
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-24
"Compatibility, compatibility, compatibility..."
Maybe if Microsoft respected ...open standards, open standards, open standards... compatibility would not be so hard to achieve.
While I respect the worry that shifting to an open, standards-compliant system might break compatibility with existing applications and documents, it will only do so once.
If you stick with Microsoft, you'll be doing the compatibility shuffle every time the whimsical Ballmer boys call the tune for you.
But you're well trained. You'll roll over on command.
Have a biscuit.