Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Sep 2007 20:24 UTC, submitted by hechacker1
Permalink for comment 270196
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-19
Will these specification make it possible to write a driver so I can put a 3D card in my headless server, have all OpenGL calls redirected and computed on this server and the results returned over the network?
You know how some people say that because X is 30 year old technology, we should dump it and start again?
Well, what you're asking for is 30 year old extensible technology (X), and the not particularly new GLX extension (GLX, not Xgl, which is something different).
Next time you hear someone say we should dump X, tell them to hollow out the bone in their head to make room for a brain. :-)
(I think I misunderstood your 'server' to mean 'server' in the X sense. Rather than do the 3D rendering on the application server, do it on a thin client with cheap 3D hardware on board. You're still running your actual apps on the application server, and getting beautifully rendered stuff on the display. Dave Richards from Largo is doing precisely this => check out his blog linked from Planet GNOME.)
Edited 2007-09-11 07:32