Linked by Joost van der Sluis on Mon 10th Sep 2007 16:03 UTC
Permalink for comment 270579
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-16
Yes but not vice versa and that's the problem
LSB is also a moving target. Too much moving. They will probably go to Gtk 2.8 or even 3.x (if such will happen) and then what.
I'm talking "forward" compatibility here, not backward.
Compiling on an ancient distro and distributing on new ones isn't the problem here. Compiling on new and making it work on older ones is.
Eg: in windows, I can compile on windows XP and if I don't use specific stuff (which by default LCL doesn't), I can happily run it in windows 95.