Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Sep 2007 21:36 UTC, submitted by dylansmrjones
Permalink for comment 271501
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-24
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/359
"For quite a while I have heard, read, and been personally told stories about messages that have been deleted from Groklaw's comment section. Specifically these are posts that do not agree with Pamela Jones' opinions and conclusions, or seek to debate or clarify issues that are not clear-cut or obvious."
Groklaw was never a trustworthy source.
There isn't much to discuss about the filthy behaviour of SCO, but I do trust people who have the real knowledge and capability like ESR or Greg Lehey.
Oh, get over it already. Groklaw got it right -- the analysis was spot on, and the predictions were accurate.
It's not because PJ is a genius -- of course she isn't. But she DID create a space where the Open-Source "many eyes" model could be applied to the legal system, and that model made all the bugs in SCO's case shallow.
You should thank her, instead of just spouting sour grapes because she got it right and you didn't.
And BTW, I've posted comments there that disagreed with her on several occasions, and mine were never removed. And I've seen others do the same. As long as your disagreement is well-reasoned, respectful, and not personal, it's safe.