Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Sep 2007 15:17 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Legal Microsoft suffered a stunning defeat on Monday when a European Union court backed a European Commission ruling that the US software giant illegally abused its market power to crush competitors. The European Union's second-highest court dismissed the company's appeal on all substantive points of the 2004 antitrustruling. The court said Microsoft, the world's largest software maker, was unjustified in tying new applications to its Windows operating system in a way that harmed consumer choice. The verdict, which may be appealed only on points of law and not of fact, could force Microsoft to change its business practices.
Permalink for comment 272065
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

And how is that Microsoft's fault?

Have I said it was the fault of Microsoft? No, I haven't. Fault doesn't matter here. What matters is whether or not Microsoft gives users the choice they have the right to.

It didn't sell because they didn't want to sell it. Why bother, since it is power users who care about the option? Power users already have a third party solution (nLite, vLite etc.).

The answer to Joe Sixpack is. Use a Media Player. There is MPC, VLC and a gazillion others. But the market was already taken by applications like nLite.

version that nobody wants

That's not true. Many people wants a version of Windows without Wi [/q]MP. They use nLite or tools like it to create custom install-CD's.

You forget that the customers who are interested in Windows N already have a version of Windows. Why buy 2 Windows licenses when you use a third party tool to do what Microsoft claims you cannot do?

Hey, why don't you start business selling it and see how well it goes? You seem to think that there is much demand for it.

Why don't you just behave like a grown-up adult instead of acting like a script-kiddie? Take a look at forums and at third party tools and you'll see how much people want to control their own systems.

WHY should we pau 800$ AGAIN!! to Microsoft just to get something we have been entitled to, the WHOLE time.

Why should Microsoft get away with violating the Human Rights Convention?

Reply Parent Score: 4