Linked by Smith Johnson on Thu 27th Sep 2007 15:22 UTC
Permalink for comment 274786
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-22
FUD for sure. The same FUD spread when XP came out. XP was not revolutionary. XP was not even stable at fist, considering driver issues and all. XP was not even accepted by the 'Nerds' and 'Geeks' until after SP1. XP offered very little over 98/2000. The differences where mostly cosmetic (from a user viewpoint, not a technical viewpoint) and it was hard to find familiar settings. XP was SLOW on average hardware (when it was released)
XP is now the STANDARD in gaming. People want XP becuase it is SO reliable and FAST.
WHY DO PEOPLE FORGET SO EASILY? YOU'LL MOAN ABOUT EVERY WINDOWS RELEASE AS LONG AS YOU LIVE...