Linked by Smith Johnson on Thu 27th Sep 2007 15:22 UTC
Permalink for comment 274806
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-04
First, I admit that I didn't read the actual articles, since the summary itself is so ridiculous that I question whether it even meets OSNews's threshold to be posted here. So maybe there is some great insight in the linked articles that I'm ignorant of.
I'll just say that XP matured with SP2. OSX matured with Panther. Win9x matured with Win98SE. Mac OS 7 matured with Mac OS 7.5x. Win3 matured with Win3.3x. See the pattern? Whenever a new OS is released it takes a few updates over the next 1 to 3 years (or so) to work out all the kinks. It'll be no different with Vista.