Linked by Smith Johnson on Thu 27th Sep 2007 15:22 UTC
Permalink for comment 274942
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-02
There's a slightly better approach. Singularity can run alongside NT as a special kernel-level process. The main NT scheduler would schedule the threads, but the singularity runtime could execute in a kernel code segement and allow direct calls into the kernel entrypoints rather than the usual hardware-protected system call mechanism.
I don't know how long it will be before the Singularity technology makes it out of Research. I read an interesting paper by the directors of the project and they seemed to be saying that the research codebase will never go directly into a product.
If a Singularity-style product goes into the market, though, it looks like it will be hard for anyone to compete. It doesn't take a genius to predict that MSR is patenting all of the core technologies needed to make that work, especially the code verifiers and the theorem-proving compiler.